COLUMNS



THE GLASS JAW OF CHAPLIN
A huge chunk of steel hits a relatively small piece of chrystalised water.
The deafening THX-sound hits my ears like a runaway train.
The low frequency bass tones starts to shake the, up to that minute, comfortable seat.
I hear how grown up men cries in the dark. To the right of me a young girl seeks shelter in her boyfriend’s arms.
People are crying their hearts out and I think to myself,
is this what takes to touch people’s hearts?
What about the disasters that hits the world for real on a daily basis?
The civil war in Chechnya , people starving to death in Africa or street kids
getting murdered in Brazil. People watches CNN and other newsservices every day and
noone seeks shelter at the person sitting next to them.
Does it take a made up love story, a huge sinking ship and
hundreds of actors screaming in pain to make us start to show our emotions? Apparently, yes…

I start to think about what host for a Swedish nature show said a couple of months ago.
He was discussing Norway’s hunt for seals. It went something like this:
"Everybody gets upset when a sealhunter kills a sea,
but when thousands are starving to death in Sudan, we just shrugs and says:
That’s life, then we change channel. And the one I blame for this is Walt Disney.
Should we care more for a seal than a kid?"
Serious questions for serious matters.

So, how much does a movie really influence our lives?
Think of how many old movies you’ve seen where there’s
a fist fight and the one who gets knocked down bounces up again,
without even one drop of blood visible. Pretty many , huh?
Then think of how many recent actionmovies you’ve seen where fights
ends up with one of the combetants lying bleeding on the ground. Pretty many too, right?
Now add these together and you have a quite respectable number of concussions at your hands.
Ok, now I want you, who don’t think that film violence has something to do with violence in our society, to raise your hands.
Of course there are other factors involved, such as upbringing, social background,
criminal background and other circumstances.
However, if a 10 year old kid watches movie after movie where people
are hitting the shit out of each other, sooner or later,
that kid will "try Mr Chaplin’s stunts" on a friend or a sibling.
It doesn’t have to be a Jean-Claude van Damme karate movie but even

a Charlie Chaplin movie can be as bad or even worse.
In a van Damme flick the violence at least leaves SOME visible marks.

Just as much as we can be positively influenced by a movie
(for example: Schindler’s list made people realize how horrible the Holocaust was,
"My left foot" made us aware of the difficulties and great fighting spirit
amongst disabled persons, "Thelma and Louise" gave a lot of women the courage
to leave their husbands etc…)
If that’s the case, why shouldn’t a violent action movie or Charlie Chaplin movie
make some people go out and "try that kick"? Of course it’s not the one
reason why it will happen.
There’s got to be a social problem as well, but my point is that a movie
can trigger that effect.
There are exceptions of course. Martin Scorsese uses a lot of violence to fully
show the bad nature of some of his characters, to make them believable.
This violence is however never explicatory or there for pure entertainment
but it has a purpose.
When "Casino" was released in Sweden, the Swedish "Board of censorship" cut it
down with several minutes which made mr Scorsese furious.
It’s not this sort of violence which needs to be cut away.
It’s a violence so realistic that it shows what a punch, kick or a gunshot
can do to a human body.
In this case it works as an antidote to violence, to make us think about it,
nothing glorifying about it at all.

Thousands of lines have already been written about Oliver Stone’s "Natural born killers"
so I won’t take your time by commenting that one too much, but here’s
an example where the intentions with the movie and its violence miserably fails to score.
"Natural born killers" surely left a bad taste in my mouth.

Movies aren’t only entertainment or an artform but a political and social statement as well.
We should never underestimate the impact movies make on us, positively and negatively.

Tobias Kleväng



THE WINNING FORMULA

Have you ever played one of those fantasy hockey/football
dreamteam competitions? You get a couple of million bucks
to put together a team with your favorite players.
You receive points if your players does well in the reallife games.
Now, imagine that you’re a fantasy movieproducer who wants to find
the perfect cast and production team.
Who would you pick?
OK, let’s start from the bottom.

You’ve received scripts from Woody Allen, Paul Schrader (Taxi driver)
and Nora Ephron (Sleepless in Seattle, When Harry met Sally).
They have all written a romantic script taking place in New York.
They’re very different from each other.
Woody’s script contains a lot of dialogue and is not even structured
in the 3 act school (his never are). His lead characters
are strongly influenced by their religious background and
that has a great impact on the script.
Schrader’s script shows the dark side of New York, revolving around
all various kinds of lowlifes and criminals,
but it’s edgy and very psychological.
Nora Ephron’s script has its usual comedy ingredients and a lot of jokes.
It’s the most "liberal" script of the 3.

Which script to pick?
They’ve all written their versions of a love scene set
in New York’s Central Park.
With Allen’s scene we have to deal with the lover’s childhood
and the whole thing ends up with the guy telling his girlfriend he’s
impotent due to lack of happiness in his family and that he’s late for
his daily appointment with his psychologist.
The girl of course answers that he’s got no respect for her mantra or something.

Schrader’s scene is of course taking place at night,
and the couple is robbed while having sex under a bush.
The male lead character of course goes berserk after this incident and not
only slaughters the robbers but also the accidentally kills his girlfriend
trying to stop him from killing the robbers. Very romantic indeed.

Ephron’s liberal approach requires you to think of the world as a
"we-are-the-world-and-nothing-bad-is-ever-going-to-happen
-to-me-except-for-a-broken-toe-nail" kind of place. Let’s move on to cinematographer..
Who would you pick?
Should you go with Sven Nykvist (Crimes and misdemeanors, Once around)
or maybe Jan deBont (Die Hard)?
Nykvist with his subtle lighting and static camera or deBont’s aggressive style?
Or perhaps you’d pick Tonino delli Colli
(The good the bad and the ugly, Death and the maiden)
to show it from another perspective, with twisted angles
and a lot of extreme closeups.

No movie is complete without an original score.
With John Williams (Indiana Jones, Star Wars, Jaws) as the composer,
the love scene would be accompanied by the entire
LA Symphony orchestra, bombastic and epic.
Even if a handgranade would explode in the movie theater,
all you’d hear would still be Williams’s score screaming out from the speakers.
The audience would believe that they were watching an orgy.
Bring in the late Bernard Hermann (Psycho, Taxi Driver, Citizen Kane)
and his "not-so-smooth" sound you’ll be waiting for Norman Bates to
jump out of the woods with a knife.
Be sure to bring some earplugs if you’re sensitive to high pitched sounds.
With Ennio Morricone (The good the bad and the ugly, The untouchables,
A fistful of dollars)you’ll hear everything from harmonicas to bottles.
It could spice up this scene with his original sound. This would however
work better if it was set in Mexico.

On to the supporting actors.
JT Walsh (Backdraft, The last seduction, Red rock west)
, who unfortunately died of a heartattack on the 27th of February 1998,
has specialized on portraying sleazeball lawyers, corrupt politicians
and other scumbags. He’d be the perfect actor to play the parkranger
who thinks he owns Central Park, telling the couple to
copulate somewhere else.
If you want a more comedic approach, you can hire Cheech Marin
(Tin cup, From dusk till dawn) as the annoying homeless dude looking
for cans under their blanket.

Now the female supporting role.
If you want a moral message, you might want young Natalie Portman
(Heat, The Professional) as the 15 year old girl who
to her disgust finds two strangers naked in her
favorite spot in the park.
Could Dianne Wiest (Bullets over Broadway, Radio Days) deliver the goods?
How could she make this scene unforgettable? Her ability to create a neurotic
persona could add a fresh flair to this scene.

Now the two leading roles. The guy and the girl.
With Robert deNiro as the guy, you’ve got one of the most versatile actors
in the business.DeNiro’s ability to physically change
during a shooting period could come at handy here. He can get the best out of the other actors in each scene.
He’s not a self-obsessed actor, and is quite happy to play
second fiddle from time to time.
Do you think it’s too downbeat, too dark? Give Jim Carrey a call.
He’d turn the scene around completely.
With Jim as the lover, the female lead would be easily forgotten.
Jim Carrey’s a scene-stealer by gigantic proportions.
How about a lover with a European background? Gerard Depardieu with his modest

almost shy acting method spiced with a French accent would surely
give the female audience something to sigh about. The leading female role could be handed Meryl Streep
if you wanted real depth in your character.
With Sandra Bullock you’d have to settle with a more lightweight character,
easy to like but not that challenging. You’d choose her if you wanted a PG-13 flick.
Cast Jessica Tandy if you want a more mature female lead. This could then be
a sequel to Cocoon and Cocoon 2.

Finally, you need someone to direct this flick.
There are several directors out there who surely would be
able to turn this into a classic.
If you’ve got the money and wants a sure hit talk to Steven Spielberg.
His name alone surely will attract the masses and
it also will
give you a tidy profit from all this.
For you who doesn’t care about how your movie will do financially,
maybe Woody Allen is the man for you.
This will also solve the problem who to cast as the leading man
since Woody 8 out of 10 times casts himself in the lead role.
Martin Scorsese can show the characters darker sides and Robert deNiro
surely would love to do another movie with Martin.

So now we have some options to chose from.
I’d pick the Paul Schrader script with the nightsetting.
This would give the "love-scene" a touch of film noir.
As cinematographer I’d go with Tonino delli Colli
with his acute angles, very unorthodox.
For the original score I’d hire John Williams
to give the scene some extra boost with a strong brass section
instead of strings (too predictable with strings)
JT Walsh as the cop patrolling the park in the night is the obvious choice.
For supporting actress I’d throw in young Natalie Portman.
She could be the young girl running away from home only to face the dangerous
elements of the city.
I’d give the male lead to Jim Carrey with his improvisation skills,
and because it would be quite nice to see how Jim would handle a love-scene
in the middle of Central Park.
Now, I need a female lead who can stand up to this actor
and that has to be given to Meryl Streep.
Wow, think about it, Jim Carrey against Meryl Streep, some match up, eh?
Last but not least. The director.
I think I’d give the job to Woody Allen. He really could make this into
an unpredictable story with lots of twists and turns.

So this is my dreamteam.
I think we’ll never EVER see a movie with this cast and production team,
but hey, one’s allowed to dream right?

Tobias Kleväng



Last updated 980726
Email me

Go back to home